Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:35:56 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
FESCo fails to define its field of activity. The moved Wiki pages for the
new FESCo don't add any description,
The thing important for me is: it seems the pages were simply moved,
without asking the public or FESCo for opinions first. Yes, the topic
was discussed once in the public some weeks earlier (without a real
outcome), but now it was simply done afaics, without even discussing
FESCo first. Was such a hectic really necessary?
1) Having to search for the old Fedora Extras main page was "Very Funny"(TM).
Apparently it's now called Fedora Packaging on the index. It's getting
confusing.
2) The rename was incomplete in that everybody who is subscribed to the
old page names, now has to update the Wiki preferences. E.g. presently
I'm still subscribed to pages, which don't exist anymore because they have
been moved somewhere.
Every single page renamed has already had redirects setup. So you dont
have to search for anything. I already send a announcement to
fedora-maintainers list about this describing what has been done explicitly.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
