On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 13:19 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 19:20 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > Does anyone have any problems with this? > > Not really here, OTOH it would be nice to document/enumerate the > constituents that can veto suggested changes alone or together with some > others enumerated in case of (hopefully very rare) disagreements as well > as document the process what happens if a change is vetoed. But there > are probably too many unknown case by case variables involved to be able > to do that, so "depends" (which roughly equals to leaving it out) is the > best I can come up with at the moment. > > The "a week" review period could maybe be clarified to "the week between > the FPC meeting that suggests these changes and the next FPC meeting, > but always >= 6 days". Good suggestions. Now, where do we officially document this at? josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
