On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 17:04 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 15:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > All I'm asking for is time for the reps from various parties to discuss > > the issues with the groups the represent and a mechanism for them to be > > able to do that. > > This sounds pretty sane to me, really. For all that spot is > all-knowing, he'll occasionally miss _something_. To try for a proposal > > The results of policy decisions from the Fedora Packaging Committee now > affect a number of different constituents within Fedora. While there > are representatives from those different constituents on FPC, it's not > fair to assume that one person knows everything. Therefore, the > proposal is to have changes to packaging policy have a week[1] for > review from impacted groups before they are "set in stone"[2]. Also, > the constituents involved in FESCO, RH, etc are accountable for getting > the changes before their respective groups for review. Yes, exactly. I was actually getting ready to type up something identical to this :). Does anyone have any problems with this? josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
