On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 15:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > All I'm asking for is time for the reps from various parties to discuss > the issues with the groups the represent and a mechanism for them to be > able to do that. This sounds pretty sane to me, really. For all that spot is all-knowing, he'll occasionally miss _something_. To try for a proposal The results of policy decisions from the Fedora Packaging Committee now affect a number of different constituents within Fedora. While there are representatives from those different constituents on FPC, it's not fair to assume that one person knows everything. Therefore, the proposal is to have changes to packaging policy have a week[1] for review from impacted groups before they are "set in stone"[2]. Also, the constituents involved in FESCO, RH, etc are accountable for getting the changes before their respective groups for review. Jeremy [1] Insert arbitrary time here... since most groups are meeting weekly, a week seemed fine. Plus, it does allow for at least the communication to occur even if there's not a meeting [2] Not that anything is ever fully set in stone _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
