On Thursday 06 July 2006 14:32, Josh Boyer wrote: > I realize that there are members of FESCo on the Packaging Committee. > And it's not as if I think the Packaging Committee is a bad idea, or are > doing things wrong. However I think the communication channels between > the two committees should be a bit more than "here's your new > guidelines, enjoy." > > Thoughts, comments? It should be up to the FESCO representation in the Packaging committee to keep FESCO abreast of whats to be discussed, how it effects Extras and what FESCO's opinions might be. Ditto for Red Hat's representative re Red Hats interest (for Core and RHEL). Its also the representatives responsibility to bring new issues brought up by FESCO, or Red Hat, to the packaging committee to discuss. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpsyZeA466iG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
