On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 19:20 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 17:04 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > The results of policy decisions from the Fedora Packaging Committee now > > affect a number of different constituents within Fedora. While there > > are representatives from those different constituents on FPC, it's not > > fair to assume that one person knows everything. Therefore, the > > proposal is to have changes to packaging policy have a week[1] for > > review from impacted groups before they are "set in stone"[2]. Also, > > the constituents involved in FESCO, RH, etc are accountable for getting > > the changes before their respective groups for review. > > Yes, exactly. I was actually getting ready to type up something > identical to this :). > > Does anyone have any problems with this? I think it will work fine. Since the packaging committee meets just before FESCo on Thursdays, it works especially well for us. I'll add an agenda item to the FESCo weekly meetings: Packaging Committee Report and Discussion, so some time is allocated to discussing these policies as they are made. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
