On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 17:42 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 19:20 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 17:04 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > The results of policy decisions from the Fedora Packaging Committee now > > > affect a number of different constituents within Fedora. While there > > > are representatives from those different constituents on FPC, it's not > > > fair to assume that one person knows everything. Therefore, the > > > proposal is to have changes to packaging policy have a week[1] for > > > review from impacted groups before they are "set in stone"[2]. Also, > > > the constituents involved in FESCO, RH, etc are accountable for getting > > > the changes before their respective groups for review. > > > > Yes, exactly. I was actually getting ready to type up something > > identical to this :). > > > > Does anyone have any problems with this? > > I think it will work fine. Since the packaging committee meets just > before FESCo on Thursdays, it works especially well for us. I'll add an > agenda item to the FESCo weekly meetings: Packaging Committee Report and > Discussion, so some time is allocated to discussing these policies as > they are made. Excellent. Thanks Toshio. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly