On Tuesday 20 June 2006 18:35, "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Definitely post-FC6, preferably post-FC7. The current board IMO needs to > > provide a strong path to lead forward. > > The "post-" is an important distinction. I would word it "within 30 > days after," which sets a deadline with enough time for decompression, > back-patting, and lessons learned post-release. Longer than that, and > it's getting too close to the release of FC(n+1)test1. I'm inclined to agree on both points. I think our current board is solid and needs time to work its magic. I say we target 30 days after the release of FC7. We don't need to break out the guillotine just yet. ;-) -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://www.n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --
Attachment:
pgpY0nw0sEOu1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
