Seth did his duty on this issue back in May (bravo, sirrah!): https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-May/msg00023.html We subsequently dropped this particular thread, but should resurrect it. (Eww, shambling reanimated thread.) I volunteer to write this up into a draft on the wiki... any further thoughts are welcome. Here's one: * FC6 is rapidly approaching. Is the intent that the board will replace one-half the community members at this time, or will the first nomination/election process take place at ~FC7? If we do it at FC6, half the seats will only serve for one release, which seems a bit, er, truncated, while the alternative puts half the seats in positions of Phenomenal Cosmic Power(tm) for three releases. I would rather see a "buyback" of whatever honeymoon period the Board had, and choose the latter option, but that's an issue that needs a quick decision. Awaiting the chopping block, -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
