On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 18:12 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > Seth did his duty on this issue back in May (bravo, sirrah!): > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-May/msg00023.html > > We subsequently dropped this particular thread, but should resurrect it. > (Eww, shambling reanimated thread.) I volunteer to write this up into a > draft on the wiki... any further thoughts are welcome. > > Here's one: > > * FC6 is rapidly approaching. Is the intent that the board will replace > one-half the community members at this time, or will the first > nomination/election process take place at ~FC7? If we do it at FC6, > half the seats will only serve for one release, which seems a bit, er, > truncated, while the alternative puts half the seats in positions of > Phenomenal Cosmic Power(tm) for three releases. I would rather see a > "buyback" of whatever honeymoon period the Board had, and choose the > latter option, but that's an issue that needs a quick decision. > > Awaiting the chopping block, Definitely post-FC6, preferably post-FC7. The current board IMO needs to provide a strong path to lead forward. Rahul _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
