Re: Fedora Logo versus OPL License

[Mark Webbink <mwebbink@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry to be late to this party.  I can confirm that Rahul is correct.  The FEDORA mark, as well as the Fedora Logo, are trademarks, and those marks are owned by Red Hat.  They are to be applied only to the original content and software released by the Fedora Project and not to modified versions of those.  The Fedora Trademark Guidelines, found here http://fedora.redhat.com/about/trademarks/guidelines/, apply equally to documentation.

Mark

Rahul Sundaram wrote:

On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 08:48 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
  

On 5/23/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    

You are wrong. The logo or artwork is not licensed under OPL.

Rahul
      

But since the Fedora Logo is now part of the contents of the wiki. It
may be considered as OPL ?

    

It doesnt work that way. Just because you upload something into the wiki
doesnt mean that it is licensed under OPL. You are free to upload a GPL
licensed artwork such BlueCurve into the wiki for example. 

Rahul

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

  

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly