I would add this:
It's a tool that Red Hat has made available to the world. It's *not* a
part of Fedora.
If certain people within Fedora use it for things, then so be it. Fedora
contributors use many different tools to do their work.
But the Fedora Project Board doesn't do any official work on 108.
--Max
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 18:12 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
I forgot to ask in the meeting - I wanted to follow up a point Rahul
made on the mailing list about 108.
Is 108 considered a rh thing or a fedora thing? Also the code for 108 is
that available somewhere or is it a closed-source-ish 'service' that red
hat is providing or what?
Closed source-ish service (with enough internal flamewars) based on
Collabnet that Red Hat provides.
Some information
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/020jun06/features/108/
It's a confusing point as to how 108 fits into the fedora world view.
My take is that it doesnt fit into the Fedora world at all though
Karsten Wade who is leading this effort said earlier that he wants a
open Fedora equivalent.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
--
Max Spevack
+ http://people.redhat.com/mspevack/
+ gpg key -- http://people.redhat.com/mspevack/mspevack.asc
+ fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
