On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 12:12 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > >> Rahul Sundaram (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > >>> It is far from clear to me why Fedora needs to provide its own > >>> infrastructure for itself rather than just use something like Savannah. > >> Integrating the translation project into Savannah seems like > >> it would be hard, if not impossible. > > > > Addtional points that would be problematic: > > > > Savannah project musts: > > * Use a license compatible with the GNU GPL; > > Any current/potential problems with this? Is the OPL compatible with the GNU GPL? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Editor * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Fedora Documentation Project http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject Learn. Network. Experience open source. Red Hat Summit Nashville | May 30 - June 2, 2006 Learn more: http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
