Why should it be avoided? SourceForge.net is not open source yet
delivers a tremendous service to the community.
We should focus on capability and community value. You get a no cost,
turnkey, hosted system with admin, backup network that you
can configure the meet the needs of the Fedora community etc. That's not
a bad deal in my book. Compare SourceForge Enterprise
against, say, Savannah (except there is not much of a comparison). I'd
be happy to admin it for the community too :-)
Col
seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 12:04 -0700, Colin Bodell wrote:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition is (today) proprietary.
and should, therefore, be avoided.
In the same way we ducked bitkeeper when we were originally looking at
SCMs
-sv
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
