On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 12:34 -0700, Colin Bodell wrote: > Why should it be avoided? SourceForge.net is not open source yet > delivers a tremendous service to the community. > We should focus on capability and community value. You get a no cost, > turnkey, hosted system with admin, backup network that you > can configure the meet the needs of the Fedora community etc. That's > not > a bad deal in my book. Compare SourceForge Enterprise > against, say, Savannah (except there is not much of a comparison). > I'd > be happy to admin it for the community too :-) Because of Fedora's goals of being once open, always open. Anything Fedora should be built up from OpenSource software. This includes the software that Red Hat users to put it together, there is something of a push to open that software too. (note that I'm speaking as a person, NOT RED HAT) Using proprietary software to facilitate the project is a nonstarter IMHO. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
