Bill Nottingham wrote: > Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> Rahul Sundaram (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >>> It is far from clear to me why Fedora needs to provide its own >>> infrastructure for itself rather than just use something like Savannah. >> Integrating the translation project into Savannah seems like >> it would be hard, if not impossible. > > Addtional points that would be problematic: > > Savannah project musts: > * Use a license compatible with the GNU GPL; Any current/potential problems with this? > * Refer to the GNU/Linux operating system instead of the Linux, > which is the kernel. Advertise the free software movements, > which we support, and not the open source one, which we don't. The blurb about GNU/Linux I found said: *... please acknowledge our work, by referring to this system as 'GNU/Linux', when you mention it in connection with this package (savannah)." I have no problem with that (and besides, they asked politely). > * Do not use "Open" in your project name. Not a problem. -- Rex
