On 05/19/2018 02:47 PM, Ken Taylor wrote: > Now that is starting to make sense. I did notice that a lot of the > -devel.i686 packages I needed were in CentOS-Base. I do not have an RHEL > machine/license to see what the upstream vendor provides. Right. EPEL builds against RHEL. RHEL has no i686 trees, only some few .i686 packages in the x86_64 repo for multiarch support. I am pretty sure this is not enough to build wine i686 for epel. This might be something more fit for the other proposal recently (an EPIC repo). kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/QW4TDGFRWIM7DS7YJ7MHL7EPHNMRENQT/
