On 05/19/2018 05:38 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
Here's a reference to one thread on the topic:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/2014-May/009527.html
and a similar post about requirements:
http://www.karan.org/blog/2013/12/15/where-is-the-i686-in-rhel-7/
Those posts are deprecated for a long time. A more interesting link is
https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/i386 which points
to the i686 build of CentOS 7 ( residing below
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/ and maintained in pair with the
regular x86_64 tree )
One requirement here would be that epel use centos for (some or all)
buildroots instead of stock rhel. I'm not aware of any movement in that
direction (yet).
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/7SKCVTJFKTJD754X3P6SKWV6H73UJSFU/
Now that is starting to make sense. I did notice that a lot of the
-devel.i686 packages I needed were in CentOS-Base. I do not have an RHEL
machine/license to see what the upstream vendor provides.
Ken
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/KMKK65YRT7XNBBZJAFVOR54JRWELUBIH/
