Re: wine 3 package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ricardo J. Barberis wrote:

> El Viernes 18/05/2018 a las 00:33, Rex Dieter escribió:
>> Ken Taylor wrote:
>> > On 05/16/2018 11:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> >> Ken Taylor wrote:
>> >>> I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning  on a
>> >>> newly installed CentOS 7.5 machine. The installation seemed to go
>> >>> fine. If I may ask two questions...
>> >>>
>> >>> Does this version of wine support 32 bit Windows programs on CentOS
>> >>> 7.5?
>> >>
>> >> No.  rhel7 (and epel7 by extension) does not support i686 arch, which
>> >> is required for win32 support
>> >
>> > Based on my experience, rhel7 and centos7 DO support i686. epel has a
>> > whole bunch of ...-devel.i686 packages. I have been running wine 1.8
>> > i686 on CentOS 7 for more than two years. I am attempting to build wine
>> > 3 from source and the epel src.rpm as I write this.
>> >
>> > I guess the question really is... is 32 bit support included in the
>> > epel binary rpm?
>>
>> No, I looked.  Here's a snippet from wine.spec hinting at it:
>> # x86-32 parts
>> %ifarch %{ix86} x86_64
>> %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} <= 6
>> Requires:       wine-core(x86-32) = %{version}-%{release}
>> Requires:       wine-capi(x86-32) = %{version}-%{release}
>> Requires:       wine-cms(x86-32) = %{version}-%{release}
>> Requires:       wine-ldap(x86-32) = %{version}-%{release}
>> Requires:       wine-twain(x86-32) = %{version}-%{release}
>> Requires:       wine-pulseaudio(x86-32) = %{version}-%{release}
>>
>> Note, only included if rhel is <=6
>>
>> Then I tried to tell you why (that rhel7 has no i686 edition and epel7
>> has
>> no i686 buildroot), but you didn't believe me.  Suit yourself.
> 
> There's no rhel7 i686 edition, but there is i686 support in the x86_64
> edition, I beieve.
> 
> At least CentOS 7 has several i686 rpms, according to random mirror:
> 
> $ lynx -dump http://centos.eecs.wsu.edu/7/os/x86_64/Packages/ | grep -c
> i686 4446

Mere existence of i686 rpms in rhel7/centos7 is does not imply either that 
wine.i686 exists or that epel7 can build it.  That's the point I've been 
trying to make (poorly, apparently).

-- Rex
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/SDGDS54WWXHBGVZ6MBSGTKRSKN7WDZIE/




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux