Ken Taylor wrote:
> On 05/16/2018 11:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Ken Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning on a
>>> newly installed CentOS 7.5 machine. The installation seemed to go fine.
>>> If I may ask two questions...
>>>
>>> Does this version of wine support 32 bit Windows programs on CentOS 7.5?
>> No. rhel7 (and epel7 by extension) does not support i686 arch, which is
>> required for win32 support
> Based on my experience, rhel7 and centos7 DO support i686. epel has a
> whole bunch of ...-devel.i686 packages. I have been running wine 1.8
> i686 on CentOS 7 for more than two years. I am attempting to build wine
> 3 from source and the epel src.rpm as I write this.
>
> I guess the question really is... is 32 bit support included in the epel
> binary rpm?
No, I looked. Here's a snippet from wine.spec hinting at it:
# x86-32 parts
%ifarch %{ix86} x86_64
%if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} <= 6
Requires: wine-core(x86-32) = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: wine-capi(x86-32) = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: wine-cms(x86-32) = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: wine-ldap(x86-32) = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: wine-twain(x86-32) = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: wine-pulseaudio(x86-32) = %{version}-%{release}
Note, only included if rhel is <=6
Then I tried to tell you why (that rhel7 has no i686 edition and epel7 has
no i686 buildroot), but you didn't believe me. Suit yourself.
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/Y2DHQLRNCK2QZFMYVCN7VP6JYOBG2TCQ/
