Re: Higher quality dmix resampling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> BTW, did you install alsa-plugins-pph or so?
>> It's a resampler from speex, and it's usually much faster and good
>> enough.
>
> upsampling to 24/192 (to an "hi-end" external DAC connected
> via I2S from a "Juli@") IME "speexrate_best" actually sounds
> even better than "samplerate_best" (subjectively speaking I
> got "smoother", less "edgy", more "natural" sound).
>
> Of course YMMV.
>
>
> Ciao,
>                                Paolo.

Is there any way to tell which resampler dmix is using?  I have:

defaults.pcm.rate_converter "speexrate_best"

in /etc/asound.conf and I restarted alsa, but I still have the static problem.

- Grant

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Alsa-user mailing list
Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user


[Index of Archives]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux