Re: Higher quality dmix resampling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 13 May 2009 12:40:39 -0700Grant <emailgrant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> BTW, did you install alsa-plugins-pph or so?> >> It's a resampler from speex, and it's usually much faster and good> >> enough.> >> > upsampling to 24/192 (to an "hi-end" external DAC connected> > via I2S from a "Juli@") IME "speexrate_best" actually sounds> > even better than "samplerate_best" (subjectively speaking I> > got "smoother", less "edgy", more "natural" sound).> >> > Of course YMMV.> >> >> > Ciao,> >                                Paolo.> > Is there any way to tell which resampler dmix is using?  I have:> > defaults.pcm.rate_converter "speexrate_best"> > in /etc/asound.conf and I restarted alsa, but I still have the static problem.> > - Grant> 

Look at output of 'lsof'.
Regards,  Sergei.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Yourproduction scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks toKodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com_______________________________________________Alsa-user mailing listAlsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux