Re: [389-users] Centos 6?

[Aaron Hagopian <airhead1@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you, I was able to install 1.2.9 from the testing repo.

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 08/05/2011 12:36 PM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:

Rich,

Trying to install 389-ds-base from your repo on SL 6.1  x86_64 and getting:

$ sudo yum install 389-ds-base --enablerepo=epel-testing

Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit

Setting up Install Process

Resolving Dependencies

--> Running transaction check

---> Package 389-ds-base.x86_64 0:1.2.8.3-1.el6 will be installed

--> Processing Dependency: 389-ds-base-libs = 1.2.8.3-1.el6 for package: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64

--> Processing Dependency: libslapd.so.0()(64bit) for package: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64

--> Running transaction check

---> Package 389-ds-base-libs.x86_64 0:1.2.8.3-1.el6 will be installed

--> Processing Conflict: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64 conflicts selinux-policy-base < 3.9.7-11

--> Finished Dependency Resolution

Error: 389-ds-base conflicts with selinux-policy-targeted

 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem

 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

Installed Packages

Name        : selinux-policy-targeted

Arch        : noarch

Version     : 3.7.19

Release     : 93.el6_1.2

Size        : 2.8 M

Repo        : installed

From repo   : sl-security

Summary     : SELinux targeted base policy

URL         : http://oss.tresys.com/repos/refpolicy/

License     : GPLv2+

Description : SELinux Reference policy targeted base module.

My selinux policy too new?

No.  The problem is that 1.2.8.3 doesn't work.  Try the latest 1.2.9.x from the testing repo.

Thanks,

Aaron Hagopian

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 08/01/2011 09:41 PM, Penedo wrote:
> On 2 August 2011 12:42, Rich Megginson<rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>> On 08/01/2011 07:54 PM, Penedo wrote:
>>> Does the requirement for a payment for the replication feature mean
>>> that I should start looking elsewhere for my LDAP needs, if I want to
>>> stick to FOSS CentOS and robust LDAP solutions? Or will the people in
>>> this forum keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version?
>> We will keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version.  We will
>> continue to provide binaries for Fedora/EPEL.
> Would this include multi-master, as it is now or another implementation?

Yes.  The separate ds-replication package is only for RHEL and RHDS
customers.

> Thanks again,
>
> --Amos

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users