On 08/01/2011 09:41 PM, Penedo wrote: > On 2 August 2011 12:42, Rich Megginson<rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 08/01/2011 07:54 PM, Penedo wrote: >>> Does the requirement for a payment for the replication feature mean >>> that I should start looking elsewhere for my LDAP needs, if I want to >>> stick to FOSS CentOS and robust LDAP solutions? Or will the people in >>> this forum keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version? >> We will keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version. We will >> continue to provide binaries for Fedora/EPEL. > Would this include multi-master, as it is now or another implementation? Yes. The separate ds-replication package is only for RHEL and RHDS customers. > Thanks again, > > --Amos -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
