On Jul 29, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Brett Dikeman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Rob Crittenden <rcritten@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Don't take this as authoritative, I'm not on the 389-ds team. >> >> I think the problem is that 389-ds-base was added to RHEL as a base package >> in 6.1 so if it gets added to epel there is going to be a conflict. > > Centos 6 is based off RHEL 6 with backported security updates from > 6.1, I believe. > > Brett > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users Rumor has it there has been a mass exodus from Centos and the ports may be a little behind. You might want to look at Scientific Linux. -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users