Re: [389-users] Centos 6?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rich,

Trying to install 389-ds-base from your repo on SL 6.1  x86_64 and getting:

$ sudo yum install 389-ds-base --enablerepo=epel-testing
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Install Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package 389-ds-base.x86_64 0:1.2.8.3-1.el6 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: 389-ds-base-libs = 1.2.8.3-1.el6 for package: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libslapd.so.0()(64bit) for package: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package 389-ds-base-libs.x86_64 0:1.2.8.3-1.el6 will be installed
--> Processing Conflict: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64 conflicts selinux-policy-base < 3.9.7-11
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: 389-ds-base conflicts with selinux-policy-targeted
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest


Installed Packages
Name        : selinux-policy-targeted
Arch        : noarch
Version     : 3.7.19
Release     : 93.el6_1.2
Size        : 2.8 M
Repo        : installed
From repo   : sl-security
Summary     : SELinux targeted base policy
URL         : http://oss.tresys.com/repos/refpolicy/
License     : GPLv2+
Description : SELinux Reference policy targeted base module.

My selinux policy too new?

Thanks,
Aaron Hagopian


On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/01/2011 09:41 PM, Penedo wrote:
> On 2 August 2011 12:42, Rich Megginson<rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>> On 08/01/2011 07:54 PM, Penedo wrote:
>>> Does the requirement for a payment for the replication feature mean
>>> that I should start looking elsewhere for my LDAP needs, if I want to
>>> stick to FOSS CentOS and robust LDAP solutions? Or will the people in
>>> this forum keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version?
>> We will keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version.  We will
>> continue to provide binaries for Fedora/EPEL.
> Would this include multi-master, as it is now or another implementation?
Yes.  The separate ds-replication package is only for RHEL and RHDS
customers.

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux