Re: [389-users] Centos 6?

Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> · Mon, 08 Aug 2011 08:49:24 -0600



    On 08/05/2011 12:36 PM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:
    Rich,
      

      Trying to install 389-ds-base from your repo on SL 6.1
         x86_64 and getting:
      

        $ sudo yum install 389-ds-base --enablerepo=epel-testing
        Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
        Setting up Install Process
        Resolving Dependencies
        --> Running transaction check
        ---> Package 389-ds-base.x86_64 0:1.2.8.3-1.el6 will be
          installed
        --> Processing Dependency: 389-ds-base-libs =
          1.2.8.3-1.el6 for package: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64
        --> Processing Dependency: libslapd.so.0()(64bit) for
          package: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64
        --> Running transaction check
        ---> Package 389-ds-base-libs.x86_64 0:1.2.8.3-1.el6
          will be installed
        --> Processing Conflict:
          389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64 conflicts selinux-policy-base
          < 3.9.7-11
        --> Finished Dependency Resolution
        Error: 389-ds-base conflicts with selinux-policy-targeted
         You could try using --skip-broken to work around the
          problem
         You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
        

          Installed Packages
          Name        : selinux-policy-targeted
          Arch        : noarch
          Version     : 3.7.19
          Release     : 93.el6_1.2
          Size        : 2.8 M
          Repo        : installed
          From repo   : sl-security
          Summary     : SELinux targeted base policy
          URL         : http://oss.tresys.com/repos/refpolicy/
          License     : GPLv2+
          Description : SELinux Reference policy targeted base
            module.
        
        
        My selinux policy too new?
      
    
    No.  The problem is that 1.2.8.3 doesn't work.  Try the latest
    1.2.9.x from the testing repo.

    
        Thanks,
        Aaron Hagopian
        

        On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Rich
          Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
          wrote:

          
            On 08/01/2011 09:41 PM, Penedo wrote:

              > On 2 August 2011 12:42, Rich Megginson<rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
               wrote:

              >> On 08/01/2011 07:54 PM, Penedo wrote:

              >>> Does the requirement for a payment for the
              replication feature mean

              >>> that I should start looking elsewhere for my
              LDAP needs, if I want to

              >>> stick to FOSS CentOS and robust LDAP
              solutions? Or will the people in

              >>> this forum keep maintaining a
              fully-functional open-source version?

              >> We will keep maintaining a fully-functional
              open-source version.  We will

              >> continue to provide binaries for Fedora/EPEL.

              > Would this include multi-master, as it is now or
              another implementation?

            
            Yes.  The separate ds-replication package is only for RHEL
            and RHDS

            customers.

            
              > Thanks again,

                >

                > --Amos

                
                --

                389 users mailing list

                389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

                https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

              
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
    
    
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users