On Wed, Aug 03,2016 at 6:15PM Dave Chinner wrote: >On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: >> On 2016-08-03 15:21, Martin Steigerwald wrote: >> >> > Lista, Carlos, I recommend: If you are concerned about spam on the list >> > contact the listmasters of it. They are the ones that can address it globally >> > for the list. >> >> Oh, I did, long ago. Still waiting. > >Yes, that is the fundamental issue - spam filtering is essentially >controlled by SGI's internal infrastructure, which we have little >option on. > >What it comes down to is whether we continue to use this list >(xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx) or whether we move to linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >so we get much more robust and up-to-date spam filtering. The issue >with doing this is forcing everyone to resubscribe, and then >capturing everything that is still sent to xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx. > >That said, I'm seriously tempted right now just to say "we're moving >to vger" and asking everyone to resubscribe to that list, and then >making xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx respond with "list moved to vger, please >repost there". i.e. not even put a forwarding gateway in place. > >If we do that, then I'll also shut down all the XFS git trees on >oss.sgi.com - I'll add commits to the them to say "go to >kernel.org". I'll need to work something out for the tarball >releases, but kernel.org does have functionality for that, too, so >that may just be a small change of process on my end (i.e. use kup). >Once that is done, we'll be running completely on community provided >infrastructure.... > >Thoughts? > >Cheers, > >Dave. >-- >Dave Chinner >david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Dave, It's probably the best option to move the mailing list to vger. Let me know what we can do to facilitate the move. Thanks, Troy _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
