Am Donnerstag, 4. August 2016, 09:15:29 CEST schrieb Dave Chinner: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > On 2016-08-03 15:21, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > Lista, Carlos, I recommend: If you are concerned about spam on the list > > > contact the listmasters of it. They are the ones that can address it > > > globally for the list. > > > > Oh, I did, long ago. Still waiting. > > Yes, that is the fundamental issue - spam filtering is essentially > controlled by SGI's internal infrastructure, which we have little > option on. > > What it comes down to is whether we continue to use this list > (xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx) or whether we move to linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > so we get much more robust and up-to-date spam filtering. The issue > with doing this is forcing everyone to resubscribe, and then > capturing everything that is still sent to xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx. > > That said, I'm seriously tempted right now just to say "we're moving > to vger" and asking everyone to resubscribe to that list, and then > making xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx respond with "list moved to vger, please > repost there". i.e. not even put a forwarding gateway in place. > > If we do that, then I'll also shut down all the XFS git trees on > oss.sgi.com - I'll add commits to the them to say "go to > kernel.org". I'll need to work something out for the tarball > releases, but kernel.org does have functionality for that, too, so > that may just be a small change of process on my end (i.e. use kup). > Once that is done, we'll be running completely on community provided > infrastructure.... > > Thoughts? Nice, so this time discussing spam on the list on the list may have a nice effect in the end. I completely agree and have no issues with resubscribung there. Thank you, -- Martin _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
