>> >> That said, I'm seriously tempted right now just to say "we're moving >> to vger" and asking everyone to resubscribe to that list, and then >> making xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx respond with "list moved to vger, please >> repost there". i.e. not even put a forwarding gateway in place. >> >> If we do that, then I'll also shut down all the XFS git trees on >> oss.sgi.com - I'll add commits to the them to say "go to >> kernel.org". I'll need to work something out for the tarball >> releases, but kernel.org does have functionality for that, too, so >> that may just be a small change of process on my end (i.e. use kup). >> Once that is done, we'll be running completely on community provided >> infrastructure.... >> >> Thoughts? >Nice, so this time discussing spam on the list on the list may have a nice >effect in the end. > >I completely agree and have no issues with resubscribung there. > >Thank you, >-- >Martin +1 here. Honestly, I don't believe that moving to vger will be a big trouble for anyone other than the list maintainer who will need to set auto-respond messages. And we have the advantage of moving it to a community provided infra as you said. Let me know if you need any help with it, I'll be glad to help in this change -- --Carlos P.S. Martin, I apologize for the dup'ed e-mail, my MUA tricked me and I didn't copy xfs list on my previous reply.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
