Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 4/18/11 9:59 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote: > ... >> Maybe coreutils will need to use FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC initially, since >> it's the only way to guarantee correct behaviour for XFS. But I would >> really rather that be the long-term way we leave things! > > XFS ... or ext4: > > # xfs_io -Ff -c "falloc 0 1m" -c "pwrite 0 512k" testfile; > /root/fiemap-test testfile > wrote 524288/524288 bytes at offset 0 > 512 KiB, 128 ops; 0.0000 sec (161.342 MiB/sec and 41303.6463 ops/sec) > start 0 length -1 flags 0x0 count 32 > ext: 0 logical: [ 0.. 255] phys: 34048.. 34303 flags: 0x801 tot: 256 > > # uname -r > 2.6.39-0.rc3.git2.0.fc16.x86_64 > > Above is on ext4. It behaves exactly like XFS in my testing; data in > the page cache does not cause fiemap to return anything other than > "unwritten" for preallocated extents. Thanks for the feedback. In case anyone wants to test or review, I've just made a coreutils snapshot: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.general/1108 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
