On 14/04/11 23:59, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:50:10AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 4/14/11 9:59 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >>> On 14/04/11 15:02, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: >>>>>> Hi Pádraig, >>>>>> >>>>>> here you go: >>>>>> + filefrag -v unwritten.withdata >>>>>> Filesystem type is: ef53 >>>>>> File size of unwritten.withdata is 5120 (2 blocks, blocksize 4096) >>>>>> ext logical physical expected length flags >>>>>> 0 0 274432 2560 unwritten,eof >>>>>> unwritten.withdata: 1 extent found >>>>>> >>>>>> Please notice that this also happens with ext4 on the same kernel. >>>>>> Btrfs is fine. >>>>> >>>> `filefrag -vs` fixes the issue on both xfs and ext4. >>> >>> So in summary, currently on (2.6.39-rc3), the following >>> will (usually?) report a single unwritten extent, >>> on both ext4 and xfs >>> >>> fallocate -l 10MiB -n k >>> dd count=10 if=/dev/urandom conv=notrunc iflag=fullblock of=k >>> filefrag -v k # grep for an extent without unwritten || fail >> >> right, that's what I see too in testing. >> >> But would the coreutils install have done a preallocation of the destination file? >> >> Otherwise this looks like a different bug... >> >>> This particular issue has been discussed so far at: >>> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8411 >>> Note there it was stated there that ext4 had this >>> fixed as of 2.6.39-rc1, so maybe there is something lurking? >> >> ext4 got a fix, but not xfs, I guess. My poor brain can't remember, I think I started looking into it, but it's clearly still broken. >> >> Still, I don't know for sure what happened to Markus - did something preallocate, in his case? > > Unwritten extent mapping behaves in an unexpected way due to > buffered writeback not occurring immediately. Extent conversion > doesn't occur until the data is on disk, and for buffered IO you > need an fdatasync to ensure that has occurred. > > That is: > > $ xfs_io -f -c "resvsp 0 10m" -c "pwrite 0 5120" -c "bmap -vp" /mnt/test/foo > wrote 5120/5120 bytes at offset 0 > 5 KiB, 2 ops; 0.0000 sec (62.600 MiB/sec and 25641.0256 ops/sec) > /mnt/test/foo: > EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE AG AG-OFFSET TOTAL FLAGS > 0: [0..20479]: 268984..289463 0 (268984..289463) 20480 10000 > > Data has not been written yet, so it is still unwritten. The same > test with a fsync shows: > > $ sudo xfs_io -f -c "resvsp 0 10m" -c "pwrite 0 5120" -c fsync -c "bmap -vp" /mnt/test/foo > wrote 5120/5120 bytes at offset 0 > 5 KiB, 2 ops; 0.0000 sec (87.193 MiB/sec and 35714.2857 ops/sec) > /mnt/test/foo: > EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE AG AG-OFFSET TOTAL FLAGS > 0: [0..15]: 268984..268999 0 (268984..268999) 16 00000 > 1: [16..20479]: 269000..289463 0 (269000..289463) 20464 10000 > > Everything is fine. > > So this seems like an application error to me. If you are going to > use fiemap to determine what ranges to copy, then you have to > fdatasync the source file first to guarantee that preallocated > extents have been converted to written state before mapping the > file.... Well IMHO there should be a difference between knowing where you are going to write, and actually writing to disk. I.E. one shouldn't need to write the whole way to the device before returning a valid fiemap. If a particular file system implementation needs to sync to return a valid fiemap, then it should be implicit. cheers, Pádraig. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
