Richard Sharpe, on 09/25/2010 06:18 PM wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Le Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:46:51 +0200 vous Ãcriviez: >> >>> I C that there is no problem with IETD ;-) >>> But we need to stay focused on SCST in this case :-) >>> >> >> Yes but you'd need to get sure that it's not scst that breaks the >> filesystem. My guess : it actually is. *I personnally didn't find SCST >> of acceptable production quality.* When did you try the last time? I guess, all you need is the latest 2.0.0.x SCST SVN branch? Or wait a bit for official 2.0 release. Vlad _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
