On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:46:51 +0200 vous écriviez: > >> I C that there is no problem with IETD ;-) >> But we need to stay focused on SCST in this case :-) >> > > Yes but you'd need to get sure that it's not scst that breaks the > filesystem. My guess : it actually is. *I personnally didn't find SCST > of acceptable production quality.* Great call there ... I see that Data Domain, Fusion IO and others have ignored your sage advice and suffered the financial consequences. -- Regards, Richard Sharpe _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
