> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:52:46PM +0200, Christian Herzog wrote: >> > Btw, what target do you use? According to >> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-stgt/msg02038.html it seems like the >> > stgt iser target has some issues that look quite similar to yours. >> we're using tgt which might have a similar problem. > > tgt and stgt is actually one and the same - the name is used a little > bit inconsistently. oh *blush* well I guess this might be our issue then.. >> As even IB over TCP is several times faster than our disks, we will now >> proceed w/o iSER to have the system running and then experiment with >> iSER on a test system. > > At least for NFS using RDMA natively mostly affects CPU usage and not > throughput, so if you have some CPU cycles to spare it might not make > much of a difference. even in our hardcore torture tests the system load is pretty reasonable, so I guess we're good. thanks, -Christian _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
