On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:40:04PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > ACK >>> >>> I didn't push this one because it's a bit critical IMHO and I will >>> explain why :-) >>> A few months ago I dropped gtk2 support from the Windows builds in >>> order to avoid maintenance of a code that is not being used as, for >>> Windows builds, we have been using gtk3 since 2.0. >>> The only problem with the gtk3 approach is that Windows XP support has >>> been dropped (I found it out after posting this patch, while debugging >>> a non-related crash). So, if we go for a gtk3 build we automatically >>> are dropping Windows XP support as well. >>> >>> So, I'd like to hear from everyone (also including Daniel) if I should >>> revert those patches removing gtk2 support for windows and with that >>> have a last release with Windows XP support or if we are okay dropping >>> Windows XP support. >> >> If anyone is mad enough to still use ancient outdated unsupported >> Windows XP, they should be just fine using an ancient outdated >> unsupported virt-viewer version too. IOW I don't care about dropping >> support for XP. >> > > Nice, so I will push this patch. Pushed! > > Best Regards, _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
