On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:40:04PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ACK > > I didn't push this one because it's a bit critical IMHO and I will > explain why :-) > A few months ago I dropped gtk2 support from the Windows builds in > order to avoid maintenance of a code that is not being used as, for > Windows builds, we have been using gtk3 since 2.0. > The only problem with the gtk3 approach is that Windows XP support has > been dropped (I found it out after posting this patch, while debugging > a non-related crash). So, if we go for a gtk3 build we automatically > are dropping Windows XP support as well. > > So, I'd like to hear from everyone (also including Daniel) if I should > revert those patches removing gtk2 support for windows and with that > have a last release with Windows XP support or if we are okay dropping > Windows XP support. If anyone is mad enough to still use ancient outdated unsupported Windows XP, they should be just fine using an ancient outdated unsupported virt-viewer version too. IOW I don't care about dropping support for XP. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
