On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:40:04PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > ACK >> >> I didn't push this one because it's a bit critical IMHO and I will >> explain why :-) >> A few months ago I dropped gtk2 support from the Windows builds in >> order to avoid maintenance of a code that is not being used as, for >> Windows builds, we have been using gtk3 since 2.0. >> The only problem with the gtk3 approach is that Windows XP support has >> been dropped (I found it out after posting this patch, while debugging >> a non-related crash). So, if we go for a gtk3 build we automatically >> are dropping Windows XP support as well. >> >> So, I'd like to hear from everyone (also including Daniel) if I should >> revert those patches removing gtk2 support for windows and with that >> have a last release with Windows XP support or if we are okay dropping >> Windows XP support. > > If anyone is mad enough to still use ancient outdated unsupported > Windows XP, they should be just fine using an ancient outdated > unsupported virt-viewer version too. IOW I don't care about dropping > support for XP. > Nice, so I will push this patch. Best Regards, _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
