On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) > <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> 2. Modify the DB to reflect 'Derives' relationship as well as >>>> 'Upgrades' for many of the OSs, for example fedoraN both derives from >>>> and upgrades fedoraN-1. >>> >>> Do we really need that ? Or is it enough to just use the upgrades >>> information directly, in addition to the upgrades info. >> >> I guess you meant to write "upgrades information directly, in >> addition to the DERIVES info" ? I suggested this change because you >> said that upgrades does not imply support of the same devices as the >> OS being upgraded so don't think osinfo_os_get_all_devices() should >> recurse into 'upgrades'. > > So is my understanding correct here and you agree with my > suggestion? If so, I'll provide patches soon. Hello? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124
