On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> 2. Modify the DB to reflect 'Derives' relationship as well as >>> 'Upgrades' for many of the OSs, for example fedoraN both derives from >>> and upgrades fedoraN-1. >> >> Do we really need that ? Or is it enough to just use the upgrades >> information directly, in addition to the upgrades info. > > I guess you meant to write "upgrades information directly, in > addition to the DERIVES info" ? I suggested this change because you > said that upgrades does not imply support of the same devices as the > OS being upgraded so don't think osinfo_os_get_all_devices() should > recurse into 'upgrades'. So is my understanding correct here and you agree with my suggestion? If so, I'll provide patches soon. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124
