Hi,
Magnus Hörlin schrieb:
> I have to agree that the vdpau deinterlacers are better than the tvtime
> ones, including the temporal only deinterlacer that is used for 1080i.
> But it is as you say a little annoying that paused images are not
> deinterlaced. I use the ION platform with 9400M.
Well, the attached patch is better than nothing but a better
approach would be to render both fields into a single surface
before displaying them. At the moment, both fields are rendered
separately.
Bye.
--
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl
mailto:rnissl@xxxxxx
diff --git a/src/video_out/video_out_vdpau.c b/src/video_out/video_out_vdpau.c
--- a/src/video_out/video_out_vdpau.c
+++ b/src/video_out/video_out_vdpau.c
@@ -1386,7 +1394,7 @@ static void vdpau_display_frame (vo_driv
XLockDisplay( this->display );
- if ( frame->format==XINE_IMGFMT_VDPAU && this->deinterlace && non_progressive && stream_speed && frame_duration>2500 ) {
+ if ( frame->format==XINE_IMGFMT_VDPAU && this->deinterlace && non_progressive /* && stream_speed */ && frame_duration>2500 ) {
VdpTime current_time = 0;
VdpVideoSurface past[2];
VdpVideoSurface future[1];
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
