Op Zo, 31 mei, 2009 11:47, schreef Magnus Hörlin: > Seppo Ingalsuo wrote: > I have to agree that the vdpau deinterlacers are better than the tvtime > ones, including the temporal only deinterlacer that is used for 1080i. > But it is as you say a little annoying that paused images are not > deinterlaced. I use the ION platform with 9400M. > /Magnus H > Yes, the deinterlacer works much nicer in combination with VDPAU. But with VDPAU I have two issues and this is why I haven't upgraded to VDPAU completely as off yet: 1. The maximum usage through VDPAU is in my case an additional 50W (compared to the ExtensionHD with a maximum of 10W) because I've got a PCI-e based videocard; 2. Using plugins like vdr-xine and/or xineliboutput you have buffering time which is annoying for zap speeds on encrypted channels. Currently I use the Reel-VDR fork and it seems to work quite nicely. And it doesn't require many patches to get it working, only some S2API based patches. Regards, Niels Wagenaar _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
