On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 01:29:22PM +0000, Tony Houghton wrote: > On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:26:18 +1000 > Torgeir Veimo <torgeir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Andy Ritger (nvidia) said in a mail to the xorg mailing list some time > > ago; > > > > "If the application doesn't enable de-interlacing, NVIDIA's VDPAU > > implementation will currently copy the weaved frame to the "progressive" > > surface, and whether it will come out correctly will depend whether the > > window's offset from the start of the screen is odd or even." > > > > I take this to imply that field parity should be possible, but the > > application in use have to detect the field flag from the source > > material and set the Y offset appropriately to be 0 or 1 accordingly. > > It also relies on vsyncing correctly. If it syncs to the wrong field > you'll get the backward juddering. I don't think VDPAU provides a way > for applications to distinguish between odd and even vsyncs, but perhaps > it does its own internal syncing. > Might be a good idea to ask Andy Ritger about that vsync to correct fields.. Hopefully Nvidia is able to fix/provide that.. VPDAU seems good otherwise.. -- Pasi _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
