Re: VDR with S2API (update)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Udo Richter <udo_richter@xxxxxx> wrote:

> I really don't get the point why it is necessary to totally rewrite
> VDR core to support multiple frontends (surely loosing compatibility
> to almost all plugins), when it will at the end just start one thread
> per frontend, while we can already start one VDR instance per
> frontend right now.

at least the /video directory that is shared across multiple vdr
instances that know nothing about each other is a single race-condition
on its own.

vdr in a massive client server configuration is a giant hack with many
pieces each with its own little problems summing up.

clemens

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux