Hi, On Fr, Dez 12, 2008 at 09:06:02 -0800, VDR User wrote: > I can say I've seen many people move away from VDR because it doesn't > provide a good solution to this. After years of using standalone VDR > boxes, I too would love if we had the option to use a networked VDR > with each client being exactly as you described... Diskless, and only > with ethernet cable + IR sensor, and each with an own OSD to control > his VDR thread. This would add more complexity to vdr and make it unstable. BTW. VDR is a video disk recorder not a media center?? I don't know an other multimedia project like vdr wich works stable like vdr. Maybe those people who wants such a networking capable vdr should fork it and implement the needed features? Please stop writing Many people move away from vdr etc. if they have a working solution it is ok. In this case there is an alternative to vdr and Klaus doesn't need to implement such features. Just my two cents. halim _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
