On 08.12.2008 10:49, Holger Rusch wrote: > Hi, > > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb: >>> FF seems to have understandably gone the way of the dinosaur. >> But the dinosaur is still the best choice to get the best picture >> quality on a PAL CRT TV ! > > But for anybody who wants to use a beamer these FF-cards are full pain > with there stupid outputs. I (and many others) want DVI/HDMI/Display-Port. > > FF will die in a years or two (months?) i guess and vdr has no well > integrated outputs. Is there anything in the VDR plugin API that would prevent a plugin from implementing a suitable output device? > Struggling with xineouput or xineplugin or softdevice is a real pain. > Same for direct AC3 output on SPDIF. > > Some other question: > > Is there any movement to files >2GB for the recordings? I will most likely change this when going to TS recording format. In doing so, I'd like to get rid of splitting recordings into separate files altogether. However, I think there might be people who still want this feature - any comments? I won't go for full 64 bit file sizes, though, because I'd like the index records to still fit into 8 byte. Using 6 byte for the file index would result in 256 TB for a single recording (or 128 TB if we avoid 'unsigned'), which I guess should be large enough ;-) Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
