Hi, On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 08.12.2008 10:49, Holger Rusch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb: > >>> FF seems to have understandably gone the way of the dinosaur. > >> But the dinosaur is still the best choice to get the best picture > >> quality on a PAL CRT TV ! > > > > But for anybody who wants to use a beamer these FF-cards are full pain > > with there stupid outputs. I (and many others) want DVI/HDMI/Display-Port. > > > > FF will die in a years or two (months?) i guess and vdr has no well > > integrated outputs. > > Is there anything in the VDR plugin API that would prevent a plugin > from implementing a suitable output device? > > > Struggling with xineouput or xineplugin or softdevice is a real pain. > > Same for direct AC3 output on SPDIF. > > > > Some other question: > > > > Is there any movement to files >2GB for the recordings? > > I will most likely change this when going to TS recording format. > In doing so, I'd like to get rid of splitting recordings into separate > files altogether. However, I think there might be people who still > want this feature - any comments? I prefer having one single file, as I don't see any need to spit it up. What happends if VDR restarts, or when the computer gets restarted? Will it continue writing to the existing file, or will it create a new one? Regards, Artem _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr