Re: VDR Development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"VDR User" <user.vdr@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I will however give you an example.  There was a time when the
> majority of dvb users I talk to used VDR, and only a few guys used
> MythTV.  Now the opposite is true.  The majority of those people are
> using MythTV and few are left who still use VDR.  Why?  Primarily lack
> of support for what's already been previously discussed a million
> times.. Lack of support for HDTV, MPEG4, DVB-S2, and a recording
> format that is actually usable.  The only surprise to me is how many
> people burn their recordings to DVD.  I don't have any interest in
> doing that but clearly a whole lot of other people do.

i'm not into dvb-s2 yet.
Without talking about this hype technology, what about :
- multiple frontend+osd support
- complex channel handling (no no not talking about xml, i hate xml)
- sourcecap patch (having to patch vdr for such a feature is a no-go
  for a lot of people)

I tend to agree, in the end a lot of people will move to
bloat^Wmythtv. (and i agree, a lot of people have stopped using vdr)


-- 

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux