Yes, it's great idea to create the repositary for VDR Goga -----Original Message-----From: Vladimir Kangin <v@xxxxxxxxxx>To: VDR Mailing List <vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx>Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:21:23 +0300Subject: Re: VDR Development > If it would be helpful for the project VDR we can contribute by setting> up server at our DC. We are supporting LinuxMCE distro and also want to> help to VDR as a part of LinuxMCE project.> > Best regards,> Vladimir> > On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 08:02 -0700, VDR User wrote:> > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Magnus Hörlin <magnus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> > > Of course you can fork it, and I'm sure someone eventually will, but I think> > > you should regard it as a totally different project and give it some other> > > name. This would lead to plugin developers having to decide which project(s)> > > to support and it will probably just be a mess.> > > I think VDR is Klaus's "child" and should remain so.> > > > Woah, wait a minute here! Nobody is suggesting to take VDR away from> > Klaus! There are clearly some good coders who want to continue> > helping progress VDR along as they already have been. The last> > released VDR update (1.7.0) was made 144 days ago. Everything people> > needed from VDR before still holds except not much development has> > been done and VDR hasn't moved forward. As much as I hate to say it,> > this is one of the main reasons so many users have abandoned VDR in> > favor of MythTV and other software.> > > > Again, nobody is suggesting to take VDR from Klaus.. Just simply allow> > progress to be made without these huge gaps where nothing happens> > where the users continue to be left in the cold while VDR continues to> > be left behind. Surely there are coders "worthy" of Klaus's 'coding> > approval' and if he doesn't want to work on VDR directly, it would> > still allow those that do to move forward and he can review the code> > rather then write it. Or have a dev tree and main tree. People can> > work on dev tree and what Klaus "approves" of could be adopted into> > main tree.> > > > Let's be clear... I've been a huge advocate for VDR. I do not want to> > see the project die, nor do I enjoy watching so many users abandon it.> > However, when much needed changes aren't made, what do you expect> > people to do? I can promise I didn't bring this topic up again to> > cause a problem. Only to point out that VDR is in need of help and> > there must be some way to move forward. Especially for the guys who> > are ready & willing! > _______________________________________________vdr mailing listvdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
