[PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
From: syrius.ml at no-log.org (syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 20 17:15:45 2006
In-reply-to: <44665F00.4090109@xxxxxxxxx> (Anssi Hannula's message of "Sun, 14 May 2006 01:34:40 +0300")
References: <JJEEJFMIKKDPLKGCNPNCEEFDCKAA.bergwinkl.thomas@xxxxxxxxx> <4306F832.9030407@xxxxxxxxxx> <4311D492.8040602@xxxxxxxxx> <43122CB3.30105@xxxxxxxxxx> <446255A9.2010304@xxxxxxxxx> <44640281.3030702@xxxxxxxxx> <4465B23F.7080105@xxxxxxxxxx> <4465D763.6030301@xxxxxxxxx> <44660148.5000107@xxxxxxxxxx> <44664C12.4050200@xxxxxxxxx> <44664F45.8040806@xxxxxxxxxx> <44665F00.4090109@xxxxxxxxx>

Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> [snip]
> I've now attached two patches. One adds a check for transfer mode in
> Receiving() and drops the then-useless "free and not the actual device"
> case from GetDevice(). The other one is optional: it changes the
> effective transfer-mode receiver priority from fixed 0 to PrimaryLimit,
> so that the transfer-mode is also "protected" by PrimaryLimit.

Seems to work as expected, Thanks !

--

References:
- [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
  - From: Thomas Bergwinkl
- [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
  - From: Klaus Schmidinger
- [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
  - From: Anssi Hannula
- [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
  - From: Klaus Schmidinger
- [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
  - From: Anssi Hannula
- [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
  - From: Anssi Hannula
- [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
  - From: Klaus Schmidinger
- [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
  - From: Anssi Hannula
- [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
  - From: Klaus Schmidinger
- [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
  - From: Anssi Hannula
- [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
  - From: Klaus Schmidinger
- [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
  - From: Anssi Hannula

Prev by Date: control-0.0.2a plugin and vdr 1.4.0
Next by Date: Suse 10.1 + nvram-wakeup + udev
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Priority of transfer-mode should not be -1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Media] [Asterisk] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Xorg] [Util Linux NG] [Xfree86] [Big List of Linux Books] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Women] [ALSA Devel] [Linux USB]